The case for and against the defensive optometrist

Abstract

Faraz F Saleem

Treatment should always follow established guidelines by regulatory boards. However, guidelines do not themselves establish the standard of care. It is more likely to be established by ophthalmologists or by a higher medical standard with advances in technology. This is dependent upon state law. In relation to medical experts, only if a witness agrees that a book, article or guideline is authoritative can the witness be questioned on that authority. The reasonable patient test may flip the coin to reduce liability in future and avoid the need for expert testimony. The prudent optometrist should act appropriately for the patient, raising standards when necessary and maintaining the reasonable standard in all other circumstances.

PDF