While that information can be helpful, it does now not fully address an investor's chance concerns. The subject of behavioral finance has contributed an essential element to the chance equation, demonstrating asymmetry between how people view gains and losses. In the language of prospect theory, a place of behavioral finance delivered by using Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1979, investors showcase loss aversion. Tversky and Kahneman documented that investors put roughly twice the weight at the pain related to a loss than the coolest feeling associated with a profit. Often, what traders really want to know isn't just how a lot an asset deviates from its anticipated outcome, however how bad things look manner down at the left-hand tail of the distribution curve. Value at hazard (VAR) tries to offer an answer to this question. The concept in the back of VAR is to quantify how large a loss on investment could be with a given stage of self belief over a defined period. For instance, the following assertion would be an instance of VAR: "With approximately a 95% stage of self belief, the maximum you stand to lose on this $1,000 investment over a two-yr time horizon is $200." The self belief stage is a probability announcement primarily based on the statistical characteristics of the funding and the shape of its distribution curve.