Theoretical

 

Objective

 

To figure out what variables of distributed urology research articles are related with future references.

 

Techniques

 

We distinguished all essential exploration articles distributed somewhere in the range of 1997 and 2007 in Journal of Urology, British Journal of Urology International, Urology, and European Urology. Just 50 articles in this period had accumulated 0 or 1 reference in a 10-year time frame following distribution. We analyzed the attributes of the articles in the low reference accomplice to the 50 articles with the most elevated number of references from similar diaries and timeframe. Understudy's t tests, Wilcoxon rank-total tests, chi-squared tests, and Fisher's precise tests were utilized to investigate the information with foreordained degree of essentialness set to P < .05.

 

Results

 

There were numerous noteworthy contrasts between the 2 partners. When contrasted with the companion of articles with 0 or 1 reference, exceptionally refered to articles were essentially bound to be a clinical report, multi-institutional and worldwide exertion, and identified with the field of urologic oncology. They were additionally essentially bound to have a bigger example size, a measurably huge essential discovering, more creators, more references, and more tables, just as longer title, conceptual, and in general original copy word tallies.

 

End

 

Not many articles distributed in the significant urology diaries collected 0 or 1 reference over a 10-year time span. This proposes most by far of articles chose for distribution are utilized for additional future examination. In any case, there were unmistakable contrasts between the 2 partners, indicating that specific components are related with articles being referred to all the more habitually.

Last Updated on: Jul 05, 2024