Analyze Mistake of the Newton Third Law New Object Mutual Action Law

Introduction

A dynamic experimented, the result of the derivation make person shocked. That be as figure 1

The spring T projected, the objects W₁ and W₂ that both masses differ, the momentum of the creation is different, explaining the acting force different two objects suffer. So, the Newton third law suffered to querys! If isn’t an actual experiment, who also most unimaginable querys the Newton third law (1-5).

 It Is Unequal to Action and Reaction

It is having in praxis the action and reaction unequal, when compressed a spring with a force, acting force namely is big and reacting force namely is small. According to the Hooke law: F = kx. When force action is in the spring, if force equal to elasticity, spring namely quiescence; if force is big to elasticity, spring namely compression (or elongate); if force is small to elasticity, spring namely projected (or shrink).

So, while force compression (or elongate) a spring, that action force namely is big to springs elasticity,

Here outside force F_action namely is the action, the elasticity of spring F_spring be reaction. So here the action is not equal reaction.

Sensors Testing

In action and reaction of two objects, use the pressures sensors prosecution test. As the figure 2:

At the figure 2 lefts, the force F_action 01 do compressed the spring Springs01, another side of the spring Springs 01, partitions one Pressures sensors 01 to supported on the Walls. Hypothesis: F_action 01=1N, so Pressures sensors 01 passed Pressures meter 01, namely displaying 1 N the force. Certainly, here Walls too contain a reacting force, namely the F *_constraint is a reaction force in constraint (6). The F *_constraint is equal with Faction 01 bulk, and the direction is contrary. But the constraint force is to do not make the work, therefore it to Pressures sensors 01, just the counterchecks act, but have no the thrust act. So Pressures sensors 01, a manifestation Faction01 is equal to 1 N.

From angles of the statics Faction01 + F *_constraint = 0                  (2.1)

But from the Pressures sensors 01 the angles of the force that suffers

Figure 3 is a force to make sensor test for object to movement. Among them the acting force F_action01 partition the Pressures sensors 01. Act in rigid body Objects 01. In rigid body Objects 01, bring a reacting force F _reaction, it is that a kind of inertial force, it is and the objects acceleration direction contrary.

Because the process of action of the above force, is a F_action01 first through Pressures sensors 01 action in Objects 01. Whereupon at F_action01 direction formation accelerated motion of the Objects 01, it at a certain twinkling of the locomotion is namely:

According to above of analysis, use the sensor test can divide the action and reaction is differ, also can test to in mechanics interaction, of the bulk of the actual action force.

The Imaginary Number

Quality of the Reaction Still take figure 3 as an example, the F_reaction engender in Objects 01. Is shown as formula (2.9), it and the displacement of the object is contrary to the direction of the acceleration. Hence question namely engendered, the F_reaction is contrary with object acceleration direction, so Freaction namely elephant, is and Objects 01 together, the direction in reverse to recessive. In formula (2.9)

action.

So, the law of newton third is wrong. the objects in two interaction so-called, action and reaction the of direction is contrarily and bulk is equal, thereupon two objects suffer the action of the same the force, its parlance is wrong. Facto, be two object interactions, under most circumstances, two forces that objects suffer respectively are all variant!

The Reality Action Forces Between the Object

Between two objects why would have force the action? This is because the object has the space constraining force in space.

The Space Constraining Force of the Object

The space constraining force of the object be, the object keeps its space the position, and movement state(velocity) is immovability, is it resist the external force the action ability, is the mass of the object. When object is in space, come in for action by the force, it inevitable be apt to resist the action of this force. But the objects resist the external force action the ability, consist in the size of the object mass. When the mass of the object is big more, in the external force actions it of the movement(velocity) changes smaller. Whereas on the mass of the object is small more, it in the movement(velocity) of the external force actions is changes bigger. So, the mass of the object namely the space constraining force of the object. The space constraining force of the object resist the action of the external force. Hypothesis have A and B two objects; their mass respectively is:

The Computation True Action Force Between Object

When two objects act mutually, they differ be the mass, namely each they the space constraining force. Therefore, two object to resist the force, inevitable reveal two the contrast of object masses, namely two objects the contrast of space constraining forces. So, from these namely determined, two objects suffer the contrast of the force and action force.

So, at this time inertial force in the A less than from impact force that it brings, but inertial force in the B biggish than from its impact force for producing. Therefore, explaining action force ain’t engender by inertial force of reaction.

New Object Mutual Action Law

The Newton third law is wrong, new the law of mutual action of object, should establish. Below is a new object mutual action law: When two objects action mutually, two objects are each from all engender the action force, the other side to action. At this time two object from producing the action force to it the ratio, is equal to these two masses of object it the ratio. Then big action force in creation in big object in mass; small action force in creation in small object in mass. The direction of the force, equal to in fact on action direction. This is the new laws of motion concerning object mutual action. Anent the movement of the object, must adopt the new object action the law, then can make the accurate computation.stance of the inertial force of reaction is many. For example, when an object, the impact and compressed a spring, the spring make object decelerated, as a result produce the inertial force in object, is equal with the elasticity of the spring. And at this time the action force of the object biggish than spring elasticity, so it the action force impossible is an inertial force.

We aren’t difficulty to discover now, two objects action mutually, for example while collide, object A and object B, all wish to burst through the other side, but the oneself keep immovability. Therefore, at this time the big mass the impact force is big, the small mass the impact force is small. But these two impacts force, Fa and Fb is from A and B the space constraining force namely the mass, and two objects the relative velocity and to exclude one another the character, the engender. It of formation, do not the need, after object get action by the force, just now the reaction inertial force that engender. So, the action force of the object, don’t is an inertial force.

The Momentum Is Not Conservation

The newton third law is wrong, so because the newton third law the theory of the proposal, namely being doubt. For instance, the law of conservation of momentum, this importance physics law, namely can by testify been wrong.

Therefore, the law of conservation of momentum is wrong. In overwhelming majority object interaction, the momentum may all is not conservation.

According to this principle, at two masses differ the object, while occurrence collide. If is big mass that object, versus object of small mass, it to collide, then two object total momentum, will become after hitting big. Contrarily, if is small mass that object, collide object of big mass, then two objects the total momentum, after collide will diminish.

Thereupon, in a matter system, by its inner the object interaction, total momentum of this matter system, is may become big, also may become small

Diversiform Instance to True Action Force Between Object

Two objects action mutually, big object in mass, generate the bigger action force. Small object in mass, generate the small action force. Such off instance no absoluteness. It in fact and only when two objects all has the higher structure intensity be useable.

If two objects action mutually, the small object in mass is a rigid body, but big object in mass, the structure intensity is lower. Then possible in action process, the big object occurrence structure destroys, but its fraction that occurrence destroy, the density is small in the mass. Thereby at here actually, small object in mass in two objects, will generate the larger action force. But happened destroy the big object, generated the small action force however.

Thereupon, object interaction, two objects action the dimension of the force, will because two objects material differ, to complicates. Small object on small mass, versus big object on big mass, generate the larger action force, this is the complete in possible. For instance, the meteorite is small, the Earth is big, but an aerolite in falling, will hit in the ground, a big meteorite crater.

According the action and reaction law, humans being manufacture and use monstrous rocket, transmit cosmos airship. But even if according the action and reaction law, the efficiency of the engine of rocket also is low-down. Because in such case, the reaction makes the matter in small mass, acquire more kinetic energy. So, the rocket fuel is burnable, energy that generate, the majority was all taken by the eruptive fuel. But rocket per se, the kinetic energy of the acquisition, then want to be small a lot of. As long as look the overall mass of the fuselage of rocket, to a instantaneous the mass of fuel in that rocket jet in it ratio, namely awareness both use energy the very wide gap.

Now, according to new object action law, two objects on mutual action, big object in mass, generate the larger action force. So, when the rocket operated, from force that fuel jet fuel take, will be more. Thereupon this explain, the fuel use efficiency of rocket, compare when it using law of action and reaction in reckon, that be much lower. So, the engine of rocket really is a the high-energy consume, however efficiency very low the equipment.

According new object mutual action law, concerning universal gravitation; concerning the computing in cosmos celestial bodies move, the likelihood also wants to proceed some modification. For instance, the gravitation between two celestial bodies, the big celestial bodies in mass envisage the small celestial bodies in mass, it’s the gravitation should be big; the small celestial bodies in mass envisage the big celestial bodies in mass, it’s the gravitation should be small. Thereupon, this is differing with newton third law. Afresh to the move of celestial bodies do computing, very may have the new discovery.

Summing-Up

My text testify newton third law is wrong. But the text still keeps to the newton first law and second law, and according to dun versus deny, the laws of motion of newton for human science, have the extremely important meaning? Particularly is newton third law, the human being namely depends on it to directed, that industrial revolution that achieve realizing the world range, and the science technical to progress unremittingly.

But science hanker is the verity, that advancement the science requires continuously, when we detect in inhere theory has error, do corrected error is an imperative at inevitable. In this way namely can achieve the scientific advancement [1-11].

Acknowledgement

The authors to thank the Editorial Office. The authors to thank references author. The authors to thank his teachers, be for his technology activity by for support: Professor Shixu Guan, Chief editor Xinmin Zhu, Principal Lanxu Xu. The authors thank ever assisted the university: Department head Shuquan Wang, Department head Xinde Jiang, Associate Professor Risheng Piao. And many teachers.

References

1. GuagSan Yu (2014) The Newton third law is wrong, http:// blog.sina.com.cn/u/2100834921.
2. GuagSan Yu (2014) The experiment of the Inertia-torque, http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/2100834921.
3. GuagSan Yu (2014) The experiment of physics of mechanics, http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/2100834921.
4. D Halliday, R Resnick (1979) 5 Physics foundation. Zeng Yongling. Beijing: Higher education publishing organization (in Chinese) 5. Cheng Souzu, Jiang Ziyong (1961) Common physics. Beijing: People's education publishing organization (in Chinese)
6. Wu Dayou (1983) Theory physics (First volumes) — Classical dynamics. Beijing: science publishing organization (in Chinese)
7. [US] Irving M Copi, Carl Cohen (2007) Introduction to Logic (Eleventh Edition). Zhang Jianjun, Pan Tianqun. Beijing: Chinese People's university publishing organization (in Chinese)
8. Chen Bo (2003) Introduction to Logic. Beijing: Chinese People's university publishing organization (in Chinese) 2003.1
9. Patrick J Hurley, Chen Bo, Song Wengan Beijing (2010) A Concise Introduction to Logic (10e). The books of world publishes company Peking company (in Chinese)
10. W Shere, G Love (1974) APPLIED MATHEMATICS FOR ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE. Zou Huansan. Beijing: science publishing organization (in Chinese)
11. Stenphen Fletcher Hewson (2010) A MATHEMATICAL BRIDGE an Intuitive Journey in Higher Mathematics. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technological Education Publishing House (in Chinese)