New Advances in Brain & Critical Care is a clinical and medical journal that caters to clinical, medical and surgical practitioners of neurology, psychology, oncology, and behavioral therapy by publishing the most recent developments on the brain focusing on the physiology, anatomy, functions, dysfunctions disorders, therapy cure and rehabilitation. The journal also caters to a wide range of readers from the cross research agencies, pharmaceutical companies, diagnostic research centers, academic institutions and students. The Journal adheres to the standard research procedures and expects the authors to abide by the guideline’s mentioned here. Plagiarism
The journal prioritizes original research. Thus, it expects the authors to make sure that they don’t violate copyrights act by reproducing the content from the others. Research is impossible without references. References made from such sources must be duly acknowledged.
Article-processing charges New Advances in Brain & Critical Care is an Open Access publisher and the standard charge for publication is $1519 payable on acceptance of each paper.
New Advances Brain & Critical Care accepts full length Research Articles, Reviews, Mini Review, Case Reports, Editorial, and Letter to the Editor, Commentary, Rapid Communications and Perspectives, Case in Images, Clinical Images, and Conference Proceedings.
Research Articles are written based on the laboratory observations or research in the clinical settings following the standard research methods and techniques such empirical surveys by collecting data from a representative sample size. Research article critically analyzes the data/observations using appropriate statistical tools, tabulations, charts and diagrams to draws conclusions. Research articles must not exceed the word limit of 8000 and must follow the prescribed format ready for publication. The chosen classification will appear in the published manuscript above the manuscript title.
Review articles are also scientific observations, yet they can be written based on the existing research data published in various forms. For example, an author may write a review articles by analyzing a series of published documents on traumatic brain injury cases and intensive care mechanism and draws conclusion, suggesting changes if any. Review articles should be within the 6000-words limit.
Case studies are developed based on the exclusive study of a specific case or situation. A study on children suffering from the post-traumatic stress disorder in the war affected zones can be a case study because it observes the children’s mental apprehensions alone in the given socio-economic, politically disastrous conditions. . Case studies can be from 3000-5000 words.
Short communication is a small discussion of any given topic within 800 words and it generally would not follow any specific research technique. It rather observes any scientific concept that is published in the current or previous issue and expresses the writer’s views on it.
Editorials Editorials are expert’s opinions, which generally would not exceed 800 words. The expert, being an authority in the subject writes on recent trends, developments, challenges etc. and observes/warn the readers on a specific issue. For example, a neurology expert may write how occupational hazards like frequent night shifts may affect the biological circadian rhythm of the individuals as an editorial.
Letters to the Editors
Letters to the editors are the reader’s perspectives, opinions and observations to the editor seeking clarity, questioning the validity, and making observations on the gaps in the research published on the current or previous issue. Letters must not exceed 400 to 500 words. Perspectives
Perspectives Perspectives are expert’s opinions on policies, principles, decisions of the government, its consequences on the people or society. Systematics and valid observations of a specialist on aging may write perspectives on recent medicinal practices in treating dementia among the aged, without exceeding 1000 words.
Proceedings are collection of abstracts accepted for presentation in the conference. Bibliographic representation of such proceedings adds value to the participant’s profile and academic indexing.
Manuscript Formatting Guidelines
Manuscript Title: The title should be limited to 25 words or less and should not contain abbreviations. The title should reflect the basic theme of the research observations.
Author Information: Complete names and affiliation of all authors, including contact details of corresponding author (Telephone, Fax and E-mail address) should be mentioned beneath the title.
Abstract: The abstract should be informative and completely self-explanatory, briefly present the topic, stating the scope of the experiment/s, indicating the significance of the study and the major findings. The abstract should summarize the manuscript content in 500 words or less. Standard nomenclature should be used, and abbreviations should be avoided. The preferable format should accommodate a description of the study background, methods, results and conclusion. At least 5 to 6 keywords should be mentioned beneath the abstract.
Text Introduction: The introduction should set the tone of the paper by providing a clear statement of the study and the proposed approach or solution. The introduction should be general enough to attract a reader’s attention by making it simpler, while detailing the significance of the study with suitable references.
Review of Literature
All the research, review and case reports must contain the sufficient review of the existing literature on the study and should draw the reader’s attention on how this study would contribute to the existing field of knowledge.
Materials and Methods: This section should provide a complete overview of the design of the study. Detailed descriptions of the research techniques observed, the sample size, and the way the experiment is conducted should be detailed presenting the data in the form of tables, figures, images etc., to make it more meaningful to the readers.
The data presented using formulae, equations etc., should be analyzed thoroughly applying the statistical methods to discuss the major observations from the study. This is an important aspect of the study that should extract the entire outcome of the stud
This section draws important findings of the study making comparisons, applying probabilities and by testing the e hypothesis to prove or reject the statement made in the beginning of the study.
Conclusions, Limitations & Recommendations
Authors summarize the entire study by siting the limitations if any such as methods applied, or the sample size or methods employed to conduct this study. Author/s make specific recommendations to advance research in this area in future.
Funding The authors must acknowledge the funding agencies if any in their studies.
Acknowledgements Author/s must acknowledge all the agencies, institutes and the individuals that supported the study in the end. Appendix Questionnaires, Abbreviations, Full form all the abridged words and the jargons must elaborated in this section to facilitate readers. References New Advances Brain & Critical Care follows APA reference style. The last name of the author/s, followed by the year of publication, title of the research paper. Name of the journal, volume no, issue no, and pages must be cited. If the article is retrieved online, the online link must also be mentioned in the reference.
E.g., Grady, J. S., Her, M., Moreno, G., Perez, C., & Yelinek, J. (2019). Emotions in storybooks: A comparison of storybooks that represent ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000185.
• Parenthetical citation: (Grady et al., 2019) • Narrative citation: Grady et al. (2019
Authored books must be cited as.
1. Jackson, L. M. (2019). The psychology of prejudice: From attitudes to social action (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000168-000 2. Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Books.
• Parenthetical citations: (Jackson, 2019; Sapolsky, 2017) • Narrative citations: Jackson (2019) and Sapolsky (2017)
1. Aron, L., Botella, M., & Lubart, T. (2019). Culinary arts: Talent and their development. In R. F. Subotnik, P. Olszewski-Kubilius, & F. C. Worrell (Eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent (pp. 345–359). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000120-016 2. Dillard, J. P. (2020). Currents in the study of persuasion. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (4th ed., pp. 115–129). Routledge.
• Parenthetical citations: (Aron et al., 2019; Dillard, 2020) • Narrative citations: Aron et al. (2019) and Dillard (2020)
Acknowledgement: This section includes acknowledgment of people, grant details, funds, etc.
Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) and that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
All works published by “International Journal of Forensic Research” is under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License. This permits anyone to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
Conflict of Interest Author/s must declare that there involves no conflict of interest while submitting the document.